Data engineers and ML practitioners who ship working systems.
The gap between a data science proof-of-concept and a working production system is wider than most teams expect. We place data engineers who build reliable pipelines, ML engineers who deploy models that stay accurate in production, and AI engineers who integrate LLMs and foundation models into real products — not just demos. Everyone we place has shipped something to production.
What's included
- Data engineers for ETL pipelines, data warehouses, and lakehouses
- ML engineers for model training, serving, and monitoring
- AI engineers for LLM integration, RAG systems, and agent development
- Data scientists who can take their own models to production
- Analytics engineers for dbt, Looker, and self-service analytics
- MLOps engineers for model versioning, drift detection, and retraining
- Data platform engineers for internal data infrastructure
- Fractional Chief Data Officer for data strategy and governance
How we deliver
- 1Role calibration: data engineer vs ML engineer vs AI engineer — what you actually need
- 2Technical screening including pipeline design or model deployment scenario
- 3Data stack assessment and candidate fit to your tools
- 4Shortlist with summary of each candidate's production track record
- 590-day milestone plan for first data or model deliverable
- 6Ongoing check-ins on technical integration and productivity
Technologies we use
- Python
- Spark
- dbt
- Airflow
- Kafka
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- Redshift
- PyTorch
- LangChain
- OpenAI API
- MLflow
Why Origin for Data & AI Engineering Staffing
Production track record, not just notebook fluency
Many data scientists can train models in Jupyter notebooks but have never deployed one. We specifically screen for engineers who have built production pipelines, handled data quality issues at scale, and operated models that run 24/7.
Full stack of data disciplines — not just 'data people'
Data engineering, ML engineering, analytics engineering, and AI engineering are distinct disciplines with different skills. We help you identify which one you actually need, then place someone who specialises in it.
AI engineers who understand product, not just models
The best AI engineers understand that a working LLM integration is about prompting strategy, retrieval quality, evaluation, and latency — not just calling an API. We look for engineers who have shipped AI features to real users.
Industries we serve
“We had a data science team with great models that we couldn't get to production reliably. Origin placed a senior ML engineer who rebuilt our serving infrastructure in 10 weeks. We went from one model deployment per quarter to deploying weekly. The leverage was immediate.”
Frequently asked questions
- What's the difference between a data engineer and an ML engineer?
- Data engineer: builds the pipelines that move, clean, and store data — the foundation everything else runs on. ML engineer: takes models built by data scientists and makes them production-ready — serving infrastructure, monitoring, retraining pipelines. Data scientist: focuses on analysis, experimentation, and model development. AI engineer: specialises in integrating foundation models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) into products. There's overlap, but the primary responsibilities are distinct.
- We want to build AI features. Do we need to hire, or can we outsource?
- Depends on how core AI is to your product. If it's a supporting feature (e.g., AI-generated summaries, search), a short-term AI engineer placement or our AI & Cloud team can build and hand it over. If AI is central to your product's value proposition, you need in-house AI engineering capability — and we can help you build it.
- We have a data scientist. Why do we also need a data engineer?
- Because data scientists and data engineers do fundamentally different things. Data scientists explore data and build models. Data engineers build the reliable, scalable pipelines that make clean data available. Without a data engineer, your data scientist spends 60–80% of their time on data cleaning and pipeline work instead of modelling. It's one of the most common and most expensive talent configuration mistakes we see.